Comparative dosimetric analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy based craniospinal irradiation plans between Halcyon ring gantry and TrueBeam C-arm linear accelerator.

This study evaluates the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dosimetric comparison between Halcyon ring gantry and TrueBeam c-arm linear accelerators for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) of the neuro-axis. 25 patients, who received treatment for medulloblastoma and primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors between 2018 and 2021, were planned for VMAT in True Beam (TB), and Halcyon (HAL) linear accelerators using 6 MV unflattened (FFF) photon beams (HALFFF and TBFFF). Dose-volume statistics for the target and organs at risk (OARs) and the total number of monitoring units (MUs) in the treatment plans were compared which included dose received by 95% PTV volume (V95%), volume receiving ≥ 107% dose, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (PI), MU and dose spillage (D10%, D30%, D50%, D70%, D90%). In all 26 OARs were considered of which five were serial and the remaining were parallel structures. For the former, the dose received by 0.2 cm3, volume = D0.2 cm3) were evaluated and for the latter mean dose were evaluated. Both arms were statistically compared with paired sample t-test with a significant value of ≤ 0.05. 11 patients received treatment with the Halcyon and the rest 14 in the TrueBeam C-arm linear accelerator. Patients in the low- and intermediate-risk category (n = 13) received 23.4 Gy in 13 fractions. The remaining patients were in the high-risk category and received 35 Gy in 21 fractions or 36 Gy in 20 fractions. For HALFFF and TBFFF, PTVV95% were 97.5 ± 0.8% and 97.4 ± 0.9% respectively (p = 0.371) while the V107% were 0.6 ± 0.4% and 0.5 ± 0.5 respectively (p = 0.504). However, the number of monitoring units showed statistical significance (p < 0.001) with values of 1331.9 ± 243.4 MU and 1089 ± 206.7 MU respectively for the HAL and TB plans. The differences in spillage dose were also statistically significant, favouring HAL plans at D30% (p = 0.002), D50% (p < 0.001), D70% (p = 0.039), and D90% (p = 0.01) level except for D10% (p = 0.090). Conformity index also showed statistical significance with PI_HAL = 0.9 ± 0.02 and PI_TB = 0.89 ± 0.03 (p = 0.029). For 10 of the 21 parallel structures, the mean dose differences were statistically significant in favouring of HAL plans. Halcyon based VMAT CSI plans are dosimetrically superior in terms of organ dose, especially for the large organs, and offer lower spillage doses than the TrueBeam plans. Plans generated by both linear accelerators are suitable for the patients' treatments.

Radiosurgery of limited brain metastases from primary solid tumor: results of the randomized phase III trial (NCT02355613) comparing treatments executed with a specialized or a C-arm linac-based platform.

BACKGROUND: Comparative prospective data regarding different radiosurgery (SRS) modalities for treating brain metastases (BMs) from solid tumors are not available. To investigate with a single institute phase III randomized trial whether SRS executed with linac (Arm-B) is superior to a dedicated multi-source gamma-ray stereotactic platform (Arm-A). METHODS: Adults patients with 1-4 BMs from solid tumors up to 30 mm in maximum diameter were randomly assigned to arms A and B. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2-3) radionecrosis (CIRN). Secondary endpoints were local progression cumulative incidence (CILP), distant brain failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to Arm-A (121) or Arm-B (130). The 1-year RN cumulative incidence was 6.7% in whole cohort, 3.8% (95% CI 1.9-7.4%) in Arm-B, and 9.3% (95% CI 6.2-13.8%) in the Arm-A (p = 0.43). CIRN was influenced by target volume irradiated only for the Arm-A (p << 0.001; HR 1.36 [95% CI 1.25-1.48]). Symptomatic RN occurred in 56 cases at a median time of 10.3 months (range 1.15-54.8 months), 27 in the Arm-B at a median time of 15.9 months (range 4.9-54.8 months), and 29 in the Arm-A at a median time of 6.9 months (1.2-32.3 months), without statistically significant differences between the two arms. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two arms in CILP, BDF, DFS or OS. The mean beam-on time to deliver SRS was 49.0 ± 36.2 min in Arm-A, and 3.1 ± 1.6 min in Arm-B. CONCLUSIONS: Given the technical differences between the treatment platforms investigated in this single-institution study, linac-based SRS (Arm-B) did not lead to significantly lower grade 2-3 RN rates versus the multi-source gamma-ray system (Arm-A) in a population of patients with limited brain metastases of small volume. No significant difference in local control was observed between both arms. For Arm-B, the treatment delivery time was significantly lower than for Arm-A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02355613.

Predictive value of clinical and radiomic features for radiation therapy response in patients with lymph node-positive head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of survival and radiation therapy response is challenging in head and neck cancer with metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). Here we developed novel radiomics- and clinical-based predictive models. METHODS: Volumes of interest of LNs were employed for radiomic features extraction. Radiomic and clinical features were investigated for their predictive value relatively to locoregional failure (LRF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) and used to build multivariate models. RESULTS: Hundred and six subjects were suitable for final analysis. Univariate analysis identified two radiomic features significantly predictive for LRF, and five radiomic features plus two clinical features significantly predictive for both PFS and OS. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve combining clinical and radiomic predictors for PFS and OS resulted 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.83) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.64-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic and clinical features resulted to be independent predictive factors, but external independent validation is mandatory to support these findings.

Knowledge-based DVH estimation and optimization for breast VMAT plans with and without avoidance sectors.

BACKGROUND: To analyze RapidPlan knowledge-based models for DVH estimation of organs at risk from breast cancer VMAT plans presenting arc sectors en-face to the breast with zero dose rate, feature imposed during the optimization phase (avoidance sectors AS). METHODS: CT datasets of twenty left breast patients in deep-inspiration breath-hold were selected. Two VMAT plans, PartArc and AvoidArc, were manually generated with double arcs from ~ 300 to ~ 160°, with the second having an AS en-face to the breast to avoid contralateral breast and lung direct irradiation. Two RapidPlan models were generated from the two plan sets. The two models were evaluated in a closed loop to assess the model performance on plans where the AS were selected or not in the optimization. RESULTS: The PartArc plans model estimated DVHs comparable with the original plans. The AvoidArc plans model estimated a DVH pattern with two steps for the contralateral structures when the plan does not contain the AS selected in the optimization phase. This feature produced mean doses of the contralateral breast, averaged over all patients, of 0.4 ± 0.1 Gy, 0.6 ± 0.2 Gy, and 1.1 ± 0.2 Gy for the AvoidArc plan, AvoidArc model estimation, RapidPlan generated plan, respectively. The same figures for the contralateral lung were 0.3 ± 0.1 Gy, 1.6 ± 0.6 Gy, and 1.2 ± 0.5 Gy. The reason was found in the possible incorrect information extracted from the model training plans due to the lack of knowledge about the AS. Conversely, in the case of plans with AS set in the optimization generated with the same AvoidArc model, the estimated and resulting DVHs were comparable. Whenever the AvoidArc model was used to generate DVH estimation for a plan with AS, while the optimization was made on the plan without the AS, the optimizer evidentiated the limitation of a minimum dose rate of 0.2 MU/°, resulting in an increased dose to the contralateral structures respect to the estimation. CONCLUSIONS: The RapidPlan models for breast planning with VMAT can properly estimate organ at risk DVH. Attention has to be paid to the plan selection and usage for model training in the presence of avoidance sectors.

Preclinical validation and treatment of volumetric modulated arc therapy based total bone marrow irradiation in Halcyon™ ring gantry linear accelerator.

AIM: This study aims​ to report preclinical validation, and the first clinical treatment of total bone marrow irradiation (TMI) and total bone marrow and lymph nodal irradiation (TMLI) using Volumetric modulated arc therapy in Halcyon-E ring gantry linear accelerator. Preclinical validation includes simulation, planning, patient-specific QA, and dry run. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Four patients, two female and two male, with body weights of 116 kg, 52 kg, 64 kg, and 62 kg; with two with chronic myeloid leukemia, one each with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were simulated and planned for TMI/TMLI. Patients were immobilized with a full-body vacuum bag. Head first supine (HFS) and Feet first supine (FFS) CT scans were acquired from head to knee and knee to toe. Planning target volume (PTV) was created with a uniform margin of 6 mm over the total bone marrow/bone marrow + lymph nodes. HFS and FFS PTVs were optimized independently using 6MV unflatten energy for 12 Gy in 6 fractions. Plans were merged to create the resultant dose distribution using a junction bias dose matching technique. The total number of isocenters was ≤ 10 per CT set, and two to four full arcs were used for each isocenter. A junction dose gradient technique was used for dose feathering between arcs between adjacent isocenters. RESULT: Only one female patient diagnosed as AML received the TMLI treatment, while the other three patients dropped out due to clinical complications and comorbidities that developed in the time between simulation and treatment. The result presented has been averaged over all four patients. For PTV, 95% dose was normalised to 95% volume, PTV_V107% receiving 3.3 ± 3.1%. Total lung mean and V12Gy were 1048.6 ± 107.1 cGy and 19.5 ± 12.1%. Maximum lens doses were 489.5 ± 35.5 cGy (left: L) and 497 ± 69.2 cGy (right: R). The mean cardiac and bilateral kidney doses were 921.75 ± 89.2 cGy, 917.9 ± 63.2 cGy (L), and 805.9 ± 9.7 cGy (R). Average Monitor Unit was 7738.25 ± 1056.6. The median number of isocenters was 17(HFS+FFS), average MU/Dose (cGy) ratio per isocenter was 2.28 ± 0.3. CONCLUSION: Halcyon-E ring gantry linear accelerator capable of planning and delivering TMI/TMLI.​​.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Metastases From Sarcoma in Oligometastatic Patients: A Phase 2 Study.

PURPOSE: The lung is the most frequent site of metastasis in patients with sarcoma. Pulmonary metastasectomy is the most common treatment performed. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has proven to be a potential alternative to resection. This prospective phase 2 study aimed to assess the role of SBRT for patients with lung metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult patients with up to 4 lung metastases (LMs) ≤5 cm in diameter and unsuitable for surgery were included. Dose prescription was based on site and size: 30 Gy/1 fraction for peripheral lesions ≤10 mm, 60 Gy/3 fractions for peripheral lesions 11 to 20 mm, 48 Gy/4 fractions for peripheral lesions >20 mm, and 60 Gy/8 fractions for central lesions. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated lesions free from progression at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Between March 2015 and December 2020, 44 patients with a total of 71 LMs were enrolled. Twelve-month local control was 98.5% ± 1.4%, reaching the primary aim; the median DFS time was 12 months (95% CI, 8-16 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year PFS rates were 50% ± 7.5%, 19.5% ± 6.6%, 11.7% ± 5.8%, 11.7% ± 5.8%, and 11.7% ± 5.8%, respectively. The median OS time was 49 months (95% CI, 24-49 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS rates were 88.6% ± 4.7%, 66.7 ± 7.6%, 56.8% ± 8.4%, 53.0% ± 8.6%, and 48.2% ± 9.1%, respectively. Prognostic factors recorded as significantly affecting survival were age, grade of primary sarcoma, interval time from diagnosis to occurrence of LMs, and number of LMs. No severe pulmonary toxicity (grade 3-4) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The study found a local control of LMs in almost all patients treated, with negligible toxicity. Survival was also highly satisfactory. Well-designed randomized trials comparing surgery with SBRT for patients with metastatic lung sarcoma are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Training and validation of a knowledge-based dose-volume histogram predictive model in the optimisation of intensity-modulated proton and volumetric modulated arc photon plans for pleural mesothelioma patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the performance of a narrow-scope knowledge-based RapidPlan (RP) model for optimisation of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans applied to patients with pleural mesothelioma. Second, estimate the potential benefit of IMPT versus VMAT for this class of patients. METHODS: A cohort of 82 patients was retrospectively selected; 60 were used to "train" a dose-volume histogram predictive model; the remaining 22 provided independent validation. The performance of the RP models was benchmarked, comparing predicted versus achieved mean and near-to-maximum dose for all organs at risk (OARs) in the training set and by quantitative assessment of some dose-volume metrics in the comparison of the validation RP-based data versus the manually optimised training datasets. Treatment plans were designed for a prescription dose of 44 Gy in 22 fractions (proton doses account for a fixed relative biological effectiveness RBE = 1.1). RESULTS: Training and validation RP-based plans resulted dosimetrically similar for both VMAT and IMPT groups, and the clinical planning aims were met for all structures. The IMPT plans outperformed the VMAT ones for all OARs for the contra-lateral and the mean and low dose regions for the ipsilateral OARs. Concerning the prediction performance of the RP models, the linear regression for the near-to-maximum dose resulted in Dachieved = 1.03Dpredicted + 0.58 and Dachieved = 1.02Dpredicted + 1.46 for VMAT and IMPT, respectively. For the mean dose it resulted: Dachieved = 0.99Dpredicted + 0.34 and Dachieved = 1.05Dpredicted + 0.27 respectively. In both cases, the linear correlation between prediction and achievement is granted with an angular coefficient deviating from unity for less than 5%. Concerning the dosimetric comparison between manual plans in the training cohort and RP-based plans in the validation cohort, no clinical differences were observed for the target volumes in both the VMAT and IMPT groups. Similar consistency was observed for the dose-volume metrics analysed for the OAR. This proves the possibility of achieving the same quality of plans with manual procedures (the training set) or with automated RP-based methods (the validation set). CONCLUSION: Two models were trained and validated for VMAT and IMPT plans for pleural mesothelioma. The RP model performance resulted satisfactory as measured by the agreement between predicted and achieved (after full optimisation) dose-volume metrics. The IMPT plans outperformed the VMAT plans for all the OARs (with different intensities for contra- or ipsilateral structures). RP-based planning enabled the automation of part of the optimisation and the harmonisation of the dose-volume results between training and validation. The IMPT data showed a systematic significant dosimetric advantage over VMAT. In general, using an RP-based approach can simplify the optimisation workflow in these complex treatment indications without impacting the quality of plans.

Radiomics-based prognosis classification for high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate if CT-based radiomics features could correlate to the risk of metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical RT and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 157 patients were investigated and radiomics features extracted from the contrast-free treatment planning CT series. Three volumes were segmented: the prostate gland only (CTV_p), the prostate gland with seminal vesicles (CTV_psv), and the seminal vesicles only (CTV_sv). The patients were split into two subgroups of 100 and 57 patients for training and validation. Five clinical and 62 radiomics features were included in the analysis. Considering metastases-free survival (MFS) as an endpoint, the predictive model was used to identify the subgroups with favorable or unfavorable prognoses (separated by a threshold selected according to the Youden method). Pure clinical, pure radiomic, and combined predictive models were investigated. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 30.7 months, the MFS at 1 and 3 years was 97.2% ± 1.5 and 92.1% ± 2.0, respectively. Univariate analysis identified seven potential predictors for MFS in the CTV_p group, 11 in the CTV_psv group, and 9 in the CTV_sv group. After elastic net reduction, these were 4 predictors for MFS in the CTV_p group (positive lymph nodes, Gleason score, H_Skewness, and NGLDM_Contrast), 5 in the CTV_psv group (positive lymph nodes, Gleason score, H_Skewnesss, Shape_Surface, and NGLDM_Contrast), and 6 in the CTV_sv group (positive lymph nodes, Gleason score, H_Kurtosis, GLCM_Correlation, GLRLM_LRHGE, and GLZLM_SZLGE). The patients' group of the training and validation cohorts were stratified into favorable and unfavorable prognosis subgroups. For the combined model, for CTV_p, the mean MFS was 134 ± 14.5 vs. 96.9 ± 22.2 months for the favorable and unfavorable subgroups, respectively, and 136.5 ± 14.6 vs. 70.5 ± 4.3 months for CTV_psv and 150.0 ± 4.2 vs. 91.1 ± 8.6 months for CTV_sv, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiomic features were able to predict the risk of metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer. Combining the radiomic features and clinical characteristics can classify high-risk patients into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the irradiation of infra diaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma in female patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of infra diaphragmatic intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for female Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients and to estimate the risk of secondary cancer and ovarian failure. METHODS: A comparative treatment planning study was performed on 14 patients, and the results were compared according to conventional dose-volume metrics. In addition, estimates of the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer induction were determined for the bowel, the bladder and the rectum. For the ovaries, the risk of ovarian failure was estimated. RESULTS: The dosimetric findings demonstrate the equivalence between VMAT and IMPT in terms of target coverage. A statistically significant reduction of the mean and near-to-maximum doses was proven for the organs at risk. The EAR ratio estimated for IMPT to VMAT was 0.51 ± 0.32, 0.32 ± 0.35 and 0.05 ± 0.11 for the bowel, bladder and rectum, respectively. Concerning the risk of ovarian failure for the chronologic age ranging from 18 to 46 years, the expected net loss in fertility years ranged from 4.8 to 3.0 years for protons and 12.0 to 5.7 years for photons. CONCLUSION: This in-silico study confirmed the beneficial role of IMPT from a dosimetric point of view. Mathematical models suggested that the use of protons might be further advantageous due to the expected reduction of the risk of secondary cancer induction and its milder impact on the reduction of fertility.

A novel external beam radiotherapy method for cervical cancer patients using virtual straight or bending boost areas; an in-silico feasibility study.

AIM: To investigate the potential role of a novel spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) method where heterogeneous dose patterns are created in target areas with virtual rods, straight or curving, of variable position, diameter, separation and alignment personalised to a patient's anatomy. The images chosen for this study were CT scans acquired for the external beam part of radiotherapy. METHODS: Ten patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were retrospectively investigated with SFRT. The dose prescription was 30 Gy in 5 fractions to 90% target volume coverage. Peak-and-valley (SFRT_1) and peak-only (SFRT_2) strategies were applied to generate the heterogeneous dose distributions. The planning objectives for the target (CTV) were D90% ≥ 30 Gy, V45Gy ≥ 50-55% and V60Gy ≥ 30%. The planning objectives for the organs at risk (OAR) were: D2cm3 ≤ 23.75 Gy, 17.0 Gy, 19.5 Gy, 17.0 Gy for the bladder, rectum, sigmoid and bowel, respectively. The plan comparison was performed employing the quantitative analysis of the dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The D2cm3 was 22.4 ± 2.0 (22.6 ± 2.1) and 13.9 ± 2.9 (13.2 ± 3.0) for the bladder and the rectum for SFRT_1 (SFRT_2). The results for the sigmoid and the bowel were 2.6 ± 3.1 (2.8 ± 3.0) and 9.1 ± 5.9 (9.7 ± 7.3), respectively. The hotspots in the target volume were V45Gy = 43.1 ± 7.5% (56.6 ± 5.6%) and V60Gy = 15.4 ± 5.6% (26.8 ± 6.6%) for SFRT_1 (SFRT_2). To account for potential uncertainties in the positioning, the dose prescription could be escalated to D90% = 33-35 Gy to the CTV without compromising any constraints to the OARs CONCLUSION: In this dosimetric study, the proposed novel planning technique for boosting the cervix uteri was associated with high-quality plans, respecting constraints for the organs at risk and approaching the level of dose heterogeneity achieved with routine brachytherapy. Based on a sample of 10 patients, the results are promising and might lead to a phase I clinical trial.

Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 68 patients treated between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Since 2009 patients received 3DCRT with 50/70 Gy to the elective/boost volumes in 35 fractions; from then, VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with 54.45/69.96 Gy in 33, or 54/66 Gy in 30 fractions. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 74% of the patients, concomitant cisplatinum in 87%. Acute and late toxicity data, progression-free survival PSF and overall survival OS, and toxicity correlations with dose metrics were reported. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 64 months, complete remission at the last evaluation was in 68% of the patients, while 28% and 9% had locoregional relapse and distant disease, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 62.7 ± 6.5% and 53.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 78.9 ± 5.5% and 61.4 ± 9.2%, respectively. At the multivariate Cox analysis TNM stage (p = 0.02) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.01) resulted significant for PFS, concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.04) for OS.Improvements in acute toxicity were presented for VMAT patients due to its ability to spare OARs. Odds ratio (OR) for acute salivary toxicity, between VMAT and 3DCRT, was 4.67 (p = 0.02). Dosimetrically, salivary toxicity correlated with mean parotid dose (p = 0.05), dysphagia with laryngeal (p = 0.04) and mean oral cavity (p = 0.06) doses, when dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are corrected for fractionation. CONCLUSION: This study is a proof of a significant benefit of the VMAT technique compared with 3DCRT in terms of side effects in nasopharynx patients, and adds dosimetric correlations.

The role of a knowledge based dose-volume histogram predictive model in the optimisation of intensity-modulated proton plans for hepatocellular carcinoma patients : Training and validation of a novel commercial system.

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of a knowledge-based RapidPlan, for optimisation of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans applied to hepatocellular cancer (HCC) patients. METHODS: A cohort of 65 patients was retrospectively selected: 50 were used to "train" the model, while the remaining 15 provided independent validation. The performance of the RapidPlan model was benchmarked against manual optimisation and was also compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) photon plans. A subanalysis appraised the performance of the RapidPlan model applied to patients with lesions ≤300 cm3 or larger. Quantitative assessment was based on several metrics derived from the constraints of the NRG-GI003 clinical trial. RESULTS: There was an equivalence between manual plans and RapidPlan-optimised IMPT plans, which outperformed the RapidArc plans. The planning dose-volume objectives were met on average for all structures except for D0.5 cm3 ≤30 Gy in the bowels. Limiting the results to the class-solution proton plans (all values in Gy), the data for manual plans vs RapidPlan-based IMPT plans, respectively, showed the following: D99% to the target of 47.5 ± 1.4 vs 47.2 ± 1.2; for organs at risk, the mean dose to the healthy liver was 6.7 ± 3.6 vs 6.7 ± 3.7; the mean dose to the kidneys was 0.2 ± 0.5 vs 0.1 ± 0.2; D0.5 cm3 for the bowels was 33.4 ± 16.4 vs 30.2 ± 16.0; for the stomach was 17.9 ± 19.9 vs 14.9 ± 18.8; for the oesophagus was 17.9 ± 15.1 vs 14.9 ± 13.9; for the spinal cord was 0.5 ± 1.6 vs 0.2 ± 0.7. The model performed similarly for cases with small or large lesions. CONCLUSION: A knowledge-based RapidPlan model was trained and validated for IMPT. The results demonstrate that RapidPlan can be trained adequately for IMPT in HCC. The quality of the RapidPlan-based plans is at least equivalent compared to what is achievable with manual planning. RapidPlan also confirmed the potential to optimise the quality of the proton therapy results, thus reducing the impact of operator planning skills on patient results.

PET/CT radiomics in breast cancer: Mind the step.

The aim of the present review was to assess the current status of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiomics research in breast cancer, and in particular to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the published papers in order to identify challenges and suggest possible solutions and future research directions. Various combinations of the terms "breast", "radiomic", "PET", "radiomics", "texture", and "textural" were used for the literature search, extended until 8 July 2019, within the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Twenty-six articles fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria were retrieved in full text and analyzed. The studies had technical and clinical objectives, including diagnosis, biological characterization (correlation with histology, molecular subtypes and IHC marker expression), prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, staging, and outcome prediction. We reviewed and discussed the selected investigations following the radiomics workflow steps related to the clinical, technical, analysis, and reporting issues. Most of the current evidence on the clinical role of PET/CT radiomics in breast cancer is at the feasibility level. Harmonized methods in image acquisition, post-processing and features calculation, predictive models and classifiers trained and validated on sufficiently representative datasets, adherence to consensus guidelines, and transparent reporting will give validity and generalizability to the results.

Dose coverage impacts local control in ultra-central lung oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is controversial in Ultra-Central lung tumors, a subset of central lung tumors characterized by proximity to critical mediastinal structures. This is of interest in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients, who can yield survival benefit from local treatments. The aim of our study is to assess the determinants of efficacy and toxicity in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and dosimetric parameters were reviewed in a cohort of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for ultra-central tumors. Local control rate (LC) and toxicity were assessed. Statistical Analysis was carried out to assess the impact of those predictors on local recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: One-hundred-nine consecutive patients were included. A median Biologic Effective Dose (BED) of 105 (75-132) Gy10 was prescribed. At a median follow-up of 17 (range 3-78) months, 2-year LC was 87%. Improved LC was correlated to Planning Treatment Volume (PTV) covered by 95% of the prescription dose (V95% PTV) > 85% (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.05-0.49, p = 0.0017) and to Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) < 90 cm3 (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.07-0.56, p = 0.0021). Overall and grade ≥ 3 toxicity incidence was 20% and 5%, respectively. Patients experiencing acute and late toxicities received significantly higher dose to 1 cm3 (D1cm3) of esophagus and lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy (V5Gy) (p = 0.016 and p = 0.013), and higher dose to 0.1 cm3 (D0.1cm3) of heart (p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: V95% PTV > 85% and GTV < 90 cm3 are independent predictors of LC. Dose to esophagus, lung and heart should be carefully assessed to minimize treatment-related toxicities.

Knowledge-based intensity-modulated proton planning for gastroesophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of a narrow-scope knowledge-based RapidPlan (RP) model, for optimisation of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans applied to patients with locally advanced carcinoma in the gastroesophageal junction. METHODS: A cohort of 60 patients was retrospectively selected; 45 were used to 'train' a dose-volume histogram predictive model; the remaining 15 provided independent validation. The performance of the RP model was benchmarked against manual optimisation. Quantitative assessment was based on several dose-volume metrics. RESULTS: Manual and RP-optimised IMPT plans resulted dosimetrically similar, and the planning dose-volume objectives were met for all structures. Concerning the validation set, the comparison of the manual vs RP-based plans, respectively, showed for the target (PTV): the homogeneity index was 6.3 ± 2.2 vs 5.9 ± 1.2, and V98% was 89.3 ± 2.9 vs 91.4 ± 2.2% (this was 97.2 ± 1.9 vs 98.8 ± 1.1 for the CTV). Regarding the organs at risk, no significant differences were reported for the combined lungs, the whole heart, the left anterior descending artery, the kidneys, the spleen and the spinal canal. The D0.1 cm3 for the left ventricle resulted in 40.3 ± 3.4 vs 39.7 ± 4.3 Gy(RBE). The mean dose to the liver was 3.4 ± 1.3 vs 3.6 ± 1.5 Gy(RBE). CONCLUSION: A narrow-scope knowledge-based RP model was trained and validated for IMPT delivery in locally advanced cancer of the gastroesophageal junction. The results demonstrate that RP can create models for effective IMPT. Furthermore, the equivalence between manual interactive and unattended RP-based optimisation could be displayed. The data also showed a high correlation between predicted and achieved doses in support of the valuable predictive power of the RP method.

The Potential Role of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hepatic Carcinoma in Mitigating the Risk of Dose De-Escalation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients to be treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in a risk-adapted dose prescription regimen. METHODS: A cohort of 30 patients was retrospectively selected as "at-risk" of dose de-escalation due to the proximity of the target volumes to dose-limiting healthy structures. IMPT plans were compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) RapidArc (RA) plans. The maximum dose prescription foreseen was 75 Gy in 3 fractions. The dosimetric analysis was performed on several quantitative metrics on the target volumes and organs at risk to identify the relative improvement of IMPT over VMAT and to determine if IMPT could mitigate the need of dose reduction and quantify the consequent potential patient accrual rate for protons. RESULTS: IMPT and VMAT plans resulted in equivalent target dose distributions: both could ensure the required coverage for CTV and PTV. Systematic and significant improvements were observed with IMPT for all organs at risk and metrics. An average gain of 9.0 ± 11.6, 8.5 ± 7.7, 5.9 ± 7.1, 4.2 ± 6.4, 8.9 ± 7.1, 6.7 ± 7.5 Gy was found in the near-to-maximum doses for the ribs, chest wall, heart, duodenum, stomach and bowel bag respectively. Twenty patients violated one or more binding constraints with RA, while only 2 with IMPT. For all these patients, some dose de-intensification would have been required to respect the constraints. For photons, the maximum allowed dose ranged from 15.0 to 20.63 Gy per fraction while for the 2 proton cases it would have been 18.75 or 20.63 Gy. CONCLUSION: The results of this in-silico planning study suggests that IMPT might result in advantages compared to photon-based VMAT for HCC patients to be treated with ablative SBRT. In particular, the dosimetric characteristics of protons may avoid the need for dose de-escalation in a risk-adapted prescription regimen for those patients with lesions located in proximity of dose-limiting healthy structures. Depending on the selection thresholds, the number of patients eligible for treatment at the full dose can be significantly increased with protons.

Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation and Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Large-breasted Patients: Long-term Toxicity and Cosmesis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of breast size on long-term toxicity and cosmesis in patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with early stage breast cancer were treated with 3-week hypofractionated SIB-VMAT to the whole breast (40.5 Gy) and tumor bed (48 Gy). Two cohorts were identified: small/medium- (< 1000 cm3) and large- (> 1000 cm3) breasted patients. Acute and late (at 2 and 5 years) skin toxicity and cosmetic data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluated associations between toxicity and dosimetric/anatomical variables. RESULTS: From August 2010 to March 2017, a total of 1160 patients were treated; 831 had at least 2 years of follow-up and were analyzed. Treated skin area (TSA) receiving at least 20 Gy > 400 cm2 and V105% of Boost > 5 cm3 were significant predictors for acute skin toxicity. Multivariate analysis at 2 years was significant for boost volume > 70 cm3, TSA > 400 cm2, and breast size > 1500 cm3. At 5 year analysis (352 patients), none of the analyzed variables was significant. For cosmetic outcome, only the breast size (> 1000 cm3) and the boost size > 70 cm3 at 2 and 5 years, respectively, confirmed significance. CONCLUSIONS: The TSA > 400 cm2 resulted as a significant predictor of both acute and late skin toxicity at 2 years; however, at 5 years, no breast size or dosimetric parameter suggested indications for increased toxicity. A worse cosmetic outcome was recorded at the 2-year follow up for large breasts, but was not confirmed at the 5-year follow-up. These long-term data suggest that hypofractionated SIB-VMAT is a viable modality also in large-breasted patients.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the postoperative irradiation of thymoma.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the radiation treatment of thymoma cancer. METHODS: Twenty patients were retrospectively planned for IMPT [with (IMPT_R1 or IMPT_R2 according to the approach adopted) and without robust optimization] and VMAT. The results were compared according to dose-volume metrics on the clinical and planning target volumes (CTV and PTV) and the main organs at risk (heart, breasts, lungs, spinal cord and oesophagus). Estimates of the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer induction were determined for the oesophagus, the breasts and the composite lungs. For the heart, the relative risk (RR) of chronic heart failure (CHF) was assessed. RESULTS: IMPT and VMAT plans resulted equivalent in terms of target coverage for both the CTV and the PTV. The CTV homogeneity index resulted in 0.03 ± 0.01 and 0.04 ± 0.01 for VMAT and all IMPT plans, respectively. The conformality index resulted in 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.2 ± 0.1 for VMAT and all IMPT plans. The mean dose to the breasts resulted in 10.5 ± 5.0, 4.5 ± 3.4, 4.7 ± 3.5 and 4.6 ± 3.4 Gy for VMAT, IMPT, IMPT_R1 and IMPT_R2. For the lungs, the mean dose was 9.6 ± 2.3, 3.5 ± 1.5, 3.6 ± 1.6 and 3.8 ± 1.4 Gy; for the heart: 8.7 ± 4.4, 4.3 ± 1.9, 4.5 ± 2.0 and 4.4 ± 2.4 Gy and for the oesophagus 8.2 ± 3.5, 2.2 ± 3.4, 2.4 ± 3.6 and 2.5 ± 3.5 Gy. The RR for CHF was 1.6 ± 0.3 for VMAT and 1.3 ± 0.2 for IMPT (R1 or R2). The EAR was 3.6 ± 0.v vs 1.0 ± 0.6 or 1.2 ± 0.6 (excess cases/10,000 patients year) for the oesophagus; 17.4 ± 6.5 vs 5.7 ± 3.2 or 6.1 ± 3.8 for the breasts and 24.8 ± 4.3 vs 8.1 ± 2.7 or 8.7 ± 2.3 for the composite lungs for VMAT and IMPT_R, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data from this in-silico study suggest that intensity-modulated proton therapy could be significantly advantageous in the treatment of thymoma patients with particular emphasis to a substantial reduction of the risk of cardiac failure and secondary cancer induction. Robust planning is a technical pre-requisite for the safety of the delivery.

Gantry-Mounted Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To establish the safety and efficacy of gantry-mounted linear accelerator-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: We pooled 921 patients enrolled on 7 single-institution prospective phase II trials of gantry-based SBRT from 2006 to 2017. The cumulative incidences of biochemical recurrence (defined by the Phoenix definition) and physician-scored genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (defined per the original trials using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) were estimated using a competing risk framework. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between late toxicity and prespecified covariates: biologically effective dose, every other day versus weekly fractionation, intrafractional motion monitoring, and acute toxicity. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 0.5-10.8 years). In addition, 505 (54.8%) patients had low-risk disease, 236 (25.6%) had favorable intermediate-risk disease, and 180 (19.5%) had unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Intrafractional motion monitoring was performed in 78.0% of patients. The 3-year cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence was 0.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-1.7%), 2.2% (95% CI, 0-4.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, 1.0-9.2%) for low-, favorable intermediate-, and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity occurred in 14.5% and 4.6% of patients, respectively. Three-year cumulative incidence estimates of late grade 2 GU and GI toxicity were 4.1% (95% CI, 2.6-5.5%) and 1.3% (95% CI, 0.5-2.1%), respectively, with late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity estimates of 0.7% (95% CI, 0.1-1.3%) and 0.4% (95% CI, 0-0.8%), respectively. The only identified significant predictors of late grade ≥2 toxicity were acute grade ≥2 toxicity (P < .001) and weekly fractionation (P < .01), although only 12.4% of patients were treated weekly. CONCLUSIONS: Gantry-based SBRT for prostate cancer is associated with a favorable safety and efficacy profile, despite variable intrafractional motion management techniques. These findings suggest that multiple treatment platforms can be used to safely deliver prostate SBRT.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), realised with RapidArc and RapidPlan methods (RA_RP) for neoadjuvant radiotherapy in locally advanced oesophagal cancer. METHODS: Twenty patients were retrospectively planned for IMPT (with two fields, (IMPT_2F) or with three fields (IMPT_3F)) and RA_RP and the results were compared according to dose-volume metrics. Estimates of the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer induction were determined for the lungs. For the cardiac structures, the relative risk (RR) of coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) were estimated. RESULTS: Both the RA_RP and IMPT approached allowed to achieve the required coverage for the gross tumour volume, (GTV) and the clinical and the planning target volumes, CTV and PTV (V98% > 98 for CTV and GTV and V95% > 95 for the PTV)). The conformity index resulted in 0.88 ± 0.01, 0.89 ± 0.02 and 0.89 ± 0.02 for RA_RP, IMPT_2F and IMPT_3F respectively. With the same order, the homogeneity index for the PTV resulted in 5.6 ± 0.6%, 4.4 ± 0.9% and 4.5 ± 0.8%. Concerning the organs at risk, the IMPT plans showed a systematic and statistically significant incremental sparing when compared to RA_RP, especially for the heart. The mean dose to the combined lungs was 8.6 ± 2.9 Gy for RA_RP, 3.2 ± 1.5 Gy and 2.9 ± 1.2 Gy for IMPT_2F and IMPT_3F. The mean dose to the whole heart resulted to 9.9 ± 1.9 Gy for RA_RP compared to 3.7 ± 1.3 Gy or 4.0 ± 1.4 Gy for IMPT_2F or IMPT_3F; the mean dose to the left ventricle resulted to 6.5 ± 1.6 Gy, 1.9 ± 1.5 Gy, 1.9 ± 1.6 Gy respectively. Similar sparing effects were observed for the liver, the kidneys, the stomach, the spleen and the bowels. The EAR per 10,000 patients-years of secondary cancer induction resulted in 19.2 ± 5.7 for RA_RP and 6.1 ± 2.7 for IMPT_2F or 5.7 ± 2.4 for IMPT_3F. The RR for the left ventricle resulted in 1.5 ± 0.1 for RA_RP and 1.1 ± 0.1 for both IMPT sets. For the coronaries, the RR resulted in 1.6 ± 0.4 for RA_RP and 1.2 ± 0.3 for protons. CONCLUSION: With regard to cancer of the oesophagogastric junction type I and II, the use of intensity-modulated proton therapy seems to have a clear advantage over VMAT. In particular, the reduction of the heart and abdominal structures dose could result in an optimised side effect profile. Furthermore, reduced risk of secondary neoplasia in the lung can be expected in long-term survivors and would be a great gain for cured patients.